Quantcast
Channel: VOIP Tech Chat forum - dslreports.com
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 6358

[Voip.ms] VOIP.MS apparently switched to an inferior LIDB for CNAM lookups

$
0
0
On roughly January 18, VOIP.MS apparently began using a different database (more fully: LIDB [line information database]) for CNAM (caller ID name) lookups for inbound calls to VOIP.MS DIDs. They used to use the best (and probably most expensive) LIDB, which is run by Verisign. This is the one used by ILECs and better providers nationwide. It has the most complete records, properly formatted. The records in the new LIDB are inferior: for about 20 percent of lookups, no name is returned (despite the presence of names for those numbers in the Verisign LIDB); and many of the names returned are truncated like this: PROPER CNAM: Catherine Helmer TRUNCATED CNAM: Catherine H VOIP.MS's new LIDB is probably cheaper for VOIP.MS. It's the same one used by Kall8 in their online call-detail records for toll-free DIDs. For Kall8, this is forgivable: they don't provide phone lines of any type, just call forwarding, so Kall8's end users' lines (whether SIP, POTS, cellular, and so on) do their own CNAM lookups (if any), and thus Kall8 users, by choosing their line provider, also choose -- indirectly -- a LIDB provider, of a quality that suits them. So the inferior CNAMs in Kall8's online calling records are probably a non-issue for most Kall8 users. VOIP.MS, on the other hand, has used the Verisign LIDB for all the years that I've had VOIP.MS service. If they have indeed switched to an inferior LIDB, they're charging the same $0.008 per lookup, which displeases me on two levels: I don't want the inferior LIDB and if I have it anyway, then I don't want to pay the same as for lookups from the superior Verisign LIDB. Possible reasons that I can imagine for the LIDB switch: (A) VOIP.MS switched to save money, perhaps in the wake of a price increase for access to Verisign's LIDB. Maybe VOIP.MS thought, "Well, no one really cares much anymore about CNAM, so let's switch and see what happens. If there's an outcry, we could easily switch back", or (B) VOIP.MS has switched LIDBs temporarily for technical reasons and intends to switch back to the Verisign LIDB, or (C) the LIDB switch occurred not at VOIP.MS itself, but rather at their upstream provider (Vitelity / Onvoy), and is beyond the control of VOIP.MS. I may misunderstand LIDBs and CNAM lookups. Please correct me if necessary. Does any of you know what might be going on? How might I (or we) cajole VOIP.MS into switching back to the better Verisign LIDB?

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 6358

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>